2015 ACR/ACC/AHA AUC for Cardiovascular Imaging in ED with Chest Pain
Appropriate Utilization Criteria for Emergency Medicine Clinicians
Published: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, February 23, 2016 Societies: ACR, ACC, AHA, AATS, ACEP, ASNC, NASCI, SAEM, SCCT, SCMR, SCPC, SNMMI, STR, STS DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.049
Overview: Appropriate Use Criteria in ED Chest Pain
This 2015 Appropriate Utilization Criteria (AUC) document applies a standardized rating system to guide cardiovascular imaging in ED patients with chest pain (CP). Each clinical scenario receives an appropriateness rating:
Appropriateness Rating Scale
Appropriate (A): Benefits generally outweigh risks; reasonable option for patient management.
May Be Appropriate (M): Benefits and risks variable; appropriate based on clinical judgment and patient preferences.
May Be Appropriate by Consensus (M*): Consensus reached despite limited evidence; use when specific data unavailable.
Rarely Appropriate (R): Risks outweigh benefits; lack of clear clinical advantage; rarely justified except in unusual circumstances.
Document Scope
This document focuses on imaging in the initial ED evaluation of patients with suspected:
Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) — including STEMI and NSTEMI
Other life-threatening conditions identified by history, exam, and initial ECG
Imaging decisions balance rapid diagnosis with radiation exposure and resource utilization. For all patients, initial assessment includes history, physical examination, 12-lead ECG, and biomarker analysis (troponin ± d-dimer).
Risk Stratification in the ED
Use risk categories to organize clinical scenarios. Apply the following scoring tools to rapidly categorize patients:
Clinical Scenario 1: When Diagnosis is Clear from Initial Workup
When 12-lead ECG shows STEMI, or initial history/exam clearly identifies noncardiac cause (pneumothorax, pneumonia, costochondritis), imaging decisions are straightforward:
Key Point: In STEMI, proceed directly to coronary catheterization. Diagnostic imaging delays reperfusion. In clearly noncardiac cases, no cardiac imaging is needed.
Imaging in Suspected NSTEMI & ACS
When ACS is suspected but ECG is not diagnostic, imaging helps risk-stratify and guide management. Two pathways are recognized:
Pathway A: Early Assessment (Serial Troponin + Early Imaging)
For patients with low-to-intermediate pretest probability:
Pearl: In low-risk patients with negative high-sensitivity troponin at 3 hours, CCTA with NPV ~99% enables safe discharge.
Pitfall: Single troponin result does not rule out ACS. Serial troponin (2–3 hours) is standard; high-sensitivity troponin may require 1–3 hours.
Imaging in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
Risk-stratify using the Wells PE Score, d-dimer, and biomarkers:
Clinical Scenario
CTPA
Compression US
VQ Scan
PMRA
Low probability; d-dimer negative
R
R
R
R
Intermediate-to-high probability
A
M
A
R
Hemodynamically unstable
A
A
R
R
Imaging Modalities for PE
CT Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA)
Sensitivity: 90–98% for lobar/central PE; lower for subsegmental
First-line in most EDs; identifies alternative diagnoses
Radiation: ~2–3 mSv
Compression Ultrasound (CompUS)
Detects DVT proximal to knee with ~95% sensitivity
May Be Appropriate if CTPA delayed/unavailable
Ventilation-Perfusion (VQ) Scan
Appropriate with normal chest X-ray and intermediate-high pretest probability
Limitation: High indeterminate rate with lung disease
Pearl: In pregnancy, PE is a leading maternal cause of death. VQ scan preferred if normal CXR; CTPA acceptable if high suspicion.
Imaging in Suspected Acute Aortic Syndrome
Aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, and penetrating ulcer present with sudden, severe, tearing chest/back pain. High mortality if not rapidly diagnosed.
Clinical Scenario
CTAo
MRAo
TEE
AoCath
Hemodynamically unstable
A
M*
M*
M*
Stable, no prior aortic intervention
A
A
M
R
Stable, prior aortic intervention
A
A
M
M*
Imaging Modalities
CT Aortography (CTAo)
Sensitivity/Specificity: >95% for dissection and intramural hematoma
Superior tissue characterization; ~98% sensitivity
Second-line due to time (30–40 min); contraindicated in unstable patients
Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE)
Bedside capability; ~95–99% sensitivity for proximal dissection
Assesses aortic regurgitation and pericardial effusion
Pitfall: Do not delay AAS diagnosis with serial imaging. If high clinical suspicion, proceed to CTAo or TEE immediately.
"Triple Rule-Out" (TRO) CTA for Unclear Diagnosis
When likelihood of ACS, PE, and AAS are all uncertain after initial workup:
Clinical Scenario
TRO CTA
Overall likelihood of ACS, PE, AAS is low
R
Overall likelihood of ACS, PE, AAS is not low
A
Note: TRO CTA has higher radiation and contrast dose. Use when differential truly spans all three diagnoses.
Clinical Pearls & Pitfalls
DO: Risk Stratify First
Use HEART, TIMI, and Wells scores before imaging selection
Serial troponin (not single value) required for ACS rule-out
Negative d-dimer in low-probability PE effectively excludes diagnosis
DON'T: Order Imaging Blindly
Avoid CCTA/SPECT in high-risk ACS (positive troponin, ischemic ECG) — proceed to cath
Do not obtain CTPA in low-probability PE without d-dimer elevation
Avoid serial imaging without clinical reason
Pearl: High-sensitivity troponin enables earlier ACS rule-out (1–3 hours). Know your institution's protocol and cutoffs.
Pitfall: Normal resting echo or SPECT does not exclude ischemia if patient not symptomatic during test.
Pearl: CCTA is increasingly used as ED "gatekeeper" test. Negative CCTA in low-risk patients safely excludes CAD and enables discharge.
Pitfall: Coronary calcium score (CCath) has no role in acute ACS. Zero score does not exclude significant CAD in symptomatic patients.
Pearl: In pregnancy, PE remains leading maternal cause of death. VQ preferred if normal CXR; CTPA acceptable if high suspicion. MR angiography is alternative.
Pitfall: Do not delay AAS diagnosis with serial testing. High clinical suspicion = proceed directly to CTAo or TEE.
Related Calculators & Risk Scores
Apply these tools to risk-stratify ED chest pain patients and guide imaging decisions: