Published: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, May 2023 Citation: Kittleson MM, et al. 2023 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Management of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;81:1835-1878. DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.03.393
The 2023 ACC Consensus Pathway represents a major update to HFpEF diagnosis and treatment, emphasizing evidence-based pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions:
SGLT2 Inhibitors as cornerstone therapy — Now Class 1 recommendation for all HFpEF patients; proven to reduce hospitalization and improve symptoms (EMPEROR-Preserved, DELIVER trials)
Refined diagnostic algorithms — H2FPEF score (simple, bedside) and HFA-PEFF algorithm (comprehensive); sex-specific diagnostic considerations for women
GLP-1 RA for obesity-HFpEF — STEP-HFpEF trial demonstrates sustained weight loss and symptomatic improvement with semaglutide in obese HFpEF patients
Elevated invasive LV end-diastolic pressure: LVEDP >16 mm Hg or PA wedge pressure >12 mm Hg
Diastolic dysfunction on echo: E/e' >9, LA volume index >34 mL/m², or increased LV wall thickness
Pearl: HFpEF now comprises >50% of HF cases. Critical point: Preserved EF does NOT exclude HF. Symptoms + signs + elevated filling pressures = diagnosis, regardless of LVEF.
Diagnostic Approach to HFpEF
Four-Step Clinical Pathway
Step 1: Clinical Assessment
Patient presents with dyspnea, exertional intolerance, and/or edema. Obtain detailed history focusing on onset, triggers, functional impact. Physical exam: orthopnea, JVD, hepatomegaly, edema, rales, S3/S4.
Echocardiogram: Measure LVEF, E/e', LA volume. Natriuretic peptides: BNP or NT-proBNP. Confirms structural/functional abnormality + elevated filling pressures/natriuretic peptides.
Step 4: Diagnostic Scoring & Further Testing
H2FPEF score (bedside) or HFA-PEFF algorithm (comprehensive). If intermediate probability, consider stress echo or invasive hemodynamics.
Do:
Obtain comprehensive HF history and physical exam in all dyspneic/edematous patients
Order echocardiogram with full Doppler assessment in suspected HFpEF
Measure BNP or NT-proBNP; interpret in clinical context (higher cutoff in AF, obesity)
Use diagnostic scoring (H2FPEF, HFA-PEFF) to estimate HFpEF probability
Initiate SGLT2i early; do not delay pending perfect diagnostic certainty
Perform invasive hemodynamics if diagnostic doubt and management implications exist
Don't:
Attribute dyspnea solely to pulmonary or deconditioning without HF workup
Assume normal systolic function excludes HF (40% have HFmrEF, 50% have HFpEF)
Use diastolic dysfunction alone as HFpEF diagnosis; symptoms + filling pressures required
Apply sex-neutral echo cutoffs; women have distinct E/e', wall thickness thresholds
H2FPEF Diagnostic Score
Simple 6-component scoring system derived from invasive hemodynamic reference standard. Each component yields 1–3 points. Score ≥6 points = high probability HFpEF.
H2FPEF Components
H (Heavy): Body mass index >30 kg/m² — 2 points
H (Hypertension): On ≥2 antihypertensive medications — 1 point
F (Fibrillation): Atrial fibrillation on ECG — 3 points
P (Pulmonary HTN): PASP >35 mm Hg on Doppler echocardiography — 1 point
E (Elder): Age >60 years — 1 point
F (Filling pressure): E/e' ratio >9 on Doppler echocardiography — 1 point
H2FPEF Score
Interpretation
Recommended Action
≥6 points
High probability HFpEF
Diagnose HFpEF; initiate GDMT (SGLT2i, diuretics, MRA, BP control)
Pursue alternative diagnoses; reassess if clinical status changes
Pitfall: H2FPEF less reliable in obesity; natriuretic peptides lower in obese HFpEF, reducing diagnostic yield. HFA-PEFF algorithm preferred in obese populations.
HFA-PEFF Diagnostic Algorithm
Comprehensive diagnostic framework from Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Four-step sequential assessment: Pretest probability → Echo/natriuretic peptides → Functional testing → Final etiology. More nuanced than H2FPEF; incorporates major/minor criteria with point-based scoring.
HFA-PEFF Four-Step Approach
Step P: Pretest Assessment
Clinical evaluation of HF likelihood based on symptoms (dyspnea, fatigue, edema), comorbidities (HTN, DM, obesity, AF, CKD), and risk factors. Assign pretest probability (low, intermediate, high).
Step E: Echocardiography & Natriuretic Peptides
Echo: LVEF, E/e' ratio (E >9 on septal, <13 on lateral), LA volume index, LV wall thickness, relative wall thickness. Biomarkers: BNP ≥35 or NT-proBNP ≥125 pg/mL.
Step F1: Functional Testing (if uncertain)
Diastolic stress test: Exercise or dobutamine echo to assess filling pressures, LV pressure rise (dP/dt). Invasive hemodynamics: Right heart catheterization with exercise if high clinical suspicion but borderline echo findings.
Step F2: Final Etiology
Advanced imaging: Cardiac MRI (CMR) for infiltration, scar. PET: Amyloidosis imaging. Biopsy: Endomyocardial biopsy if infiltrative disease suspected. Genetic: Gene testing for familial conditions.
HFA-PEFF Scoring
≥25 points: HFpEF diagnosis confirmed. Major criteria (2 pts each): abnormal E/e', LA enlargement, LV hypertrophy, elevated natriuretic peptides. Minor criteria (1 pt): abnormal diastolic dysfunction measures, reduced peak VO₂, elevated LV filling pressure on stress test.
Pearl: HFA-PEFF superior in obese and AF populations where simple cutoffs less reliable. Recommended for comprehensive diagnostic uncertainty.
HFpEF Phenotypes & Targeted Management
HFpEF is heterogeneous disease with distinct phenotypes driving different pathophysiology and therapy responses. Identify predominant phenotype for personalized management.
eGFR ≥20 mL/min/1.73 m²; assess volume status; monitor kidney function
Safety & Special Considerations
Acute kidney injury: Risk in dehydration, aggressive diuresis, or eGFR <20; dose carefully in CKD
Genital infections: SGLT2 increase glucosuria; counsel on hygiene; incidence ~10%
Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA): Rare but serious; contraindicated in type 1 diabetes, active DKA history; educate on symptoms
Volume depletion: May reduce diuretic requirement; monitor orthostasis and hypotension
Amputation: Not increased in HF trials (unlike diabetes trials); benefit-risk favorable in HFpEF
Pearl: SGLT2i benefit in HFpEF independent of diabetes or glucose control. Recommend for ALL HFpEF, including nondiabetic, euglycemic patients. Begin early; do not wait for GDMT optimization or perfect diagnostic certainty.
Diuretic Management in HFpEF
Class 1 Loop diuretics essential for symptom relief and volume management. Titrate to euvolemia; use minimum effective dose to minimize adverse effects.
Loop Diuretics
Agents: Furosemide (40–80 mg daily), bumetanide (0.5–1 mg daily), torsemide (10–20 mg daily; preferred for superior bioavailability)
Titration: Increase dose if orthopnea, rales, JVD, edema persist; decrease if euvolemic and low fill pressures
Monitoring: Daily weights (alert if gain >2–3 lbs/day); electrolytes (K+, Na+, Cl−, HCO3−); renal function; orthostatic BP
Dosing Strategy by Clinical Status
Acute decompensation: IV loop diuretic; target negative 0.5–1.0 kg/day; transition to oral when euvolemic
Chronic outpatient: Lowest dose maintaining euvolemia; many HFpEF respond to lower doses than HFrEF
CKD Stage 4–5: Higher doses often required; coordinate with nephrology for kidney protection strategies
Pitfall: Chronic overdiuresis leads to azotemia, electrolyte abnormalities, loss of exercise capacity. Regularly reassess dry weight and diuretic requirement. Many HFpEF patients can be downtitrated during stable periods.
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists (MRAs)
Class 2a Consider spironolactone or eplerenone in HFpEF patients to improve diastolic function and reduce HF hospitalization risk.
Mechanism & Evidence
TOPCAT Trial: Spironolactone 15–45 mg daily in LVEF ≥45%; modest 20% reduction in HF hospitalization; greater benefit in North America vs. Russia/Georgia cohorts
K+, Cr at baseline; 1 wk, 4 wks, 12 wks, then annually. Goal K+ ≤5.0 mEq/L
Eplerenone
25 mg daily
50 mg daily
K+, Cr at baseline; 1 wk, 4 wks, 12 wks, then annually. Gynecomastia less common than spironolactone
Safety & Contraindications
Hyperkalemia: Risk if K+ >5.0 mEq/L, eGFR <30, or concomitant ACEi/ARB/ARNI without close K+ monitoring. Use careful drug combinations and regular labs
Gynecomastia: Spironolactone 10–20%; eplerenone preferred if problematic
Drug interactions: NSAIDs, trimethoprim, ACEi/ARB increase hyperkalemia risk
GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Obesity-HFpEF
Class 2b Consider GLP-1 RA (semaglutide) in obese HFpEF patients for weight loss and symptom improvement.
Evidence: STEP-HFpEF Trial
Design: 529 obese HFpEF patients randomized to semaglutide 2.4 mg SC weekly vs. placebo
Results: Semaglutide achieved sustained weight loss (>10% body weight reduction), improved KCCQ (symptom score) by ~5–8 points, improved 6-minute walk distance
Safety: Gastrointestinal side effects (nausea, vomiting) common initially; adjustable with dose titration
Dosing & Administration
Semaglutide: Start 0.25 mg SC weekly; increase by 0.25 mg every 4 weeks to target 2.4 mg weekly (maintenance: 2.4 mg weekly)
Timing: Begin after stable GDMT; reassess diuretic requirement as weight decreases
Monitoring: Weekly weights, volume status, kidney function; adjust diuretics downward if >5 lbs weight loss observed
Special Considerations
Volume depletion: GLP-1 RA + diuretics carry risk of acute kidney injury, hypotension, syncope; educate on hydration
Gastrointestinal symptoms: Nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea; often improve with slower titration or dietary modification
Pancreatitis: Rare but serious; counsel on symptoms (epigastric pain, elevated amylase)
Contraindications: Personal history medullary thyroid cancer, MEN syndrome Type 2; relative: severe renal/hepatic disease
Pearl: Substantial weight loss with GLP-1 RA may lead to overdiuresis and acute kidney injury. Proactively reduce loop diuretic dose and monitor renal function closely. GLP-1 RA benefit in HFpEF promising but requires careful patient selection and monitoring.
Comorbidity Management in HFpEF
Hypertension
Class 1 Blood pressure control foundational. Target <130/80 mm Hg (older adults may tolerate <140/90). Antihypertensive agents: ACEi/ARB, beta-blockers, CCBs (diltiazem, verapamil preferred), thiazides.
Note: Many HFpEF require ≥2 agents for BP control; avoid sudden withdrawal (rebound HTN)
Class 1 SGLT2i first-line for all HFpEF with diabetes; benefits independent of glucose control. GLP-1 RA if obesity present. Target HbA1c 7–8% (individualize).
Agents: Metformin (safe if eGFR >30); avoid if eGFR <30. DPP-4i neutral on HF. TZD caution (fluid retention).
Dosing: SGLT2i 10mg daily, GLP-1 RA titrate to 2.4mg weekly
Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)
Class 1 SGLT2i slow CKD progression, reduce ESRD risk. RAAS inhibitors (ACEi/ARB) protective; coordinate with nephrology for monitoring.
eGFR ≥30: SGLT2i, ACEi/ARB, ARNI, MRA with close K+ monitoring
Integrate palliative care early for quality-of-life focus, symptom control, advance care planning
Don't:
Attribute dyspnea solely to lungs or deconditioning; always evaluate for HF
Assume normal systolic EF excludes HF (40% HFmrEF, 50% HFpEF)
Use isolated diastolic dysfunction as HFpEF diagnosis; require symptoms + elevated filling pressures
Apply sex-neutral echo cutoffs; women have distinct E/e', wall thickness thresholds in HFpEF
Delay SGLT2i pending diagnostic certainty; initiate early in suspected HFpEF
Chronically overdiurese; titrate loop diuretics to euvolemia and reassess regularly
Withhold ACEi/ARB/ARNi from fear of hypotension; titrate slowly; improvement often observed
Overlook comorbidities; each (obesity, HTN, DM, AF, CKD, OSA) requires targeted management
Neglect palliative care in advanced HFpEF; integrate early alongside curative therapies
Ignore patient education; counsel on symptoms, red flags, when to seek care, medication adherence
Disclaimer: This quick reference is based on the 2023 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Management of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (Kittleson MM, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;81:1835–1878). It is intended for medical professionals and should supplement, not replace, clinical judgment or the full guideline text. Always consult the complete publication and individualize management to each patient. For full citations and details, see the original guideline at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.03.393.