← Back to Guidelines

2025 ESC/EAS Dyslipidemia Update

Focused Update of the 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias

Published: European Heart Journal (2025) 46, 4359–4378
Societies: European Society of Cardiology (ESC) / European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS)
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf190
View Full Guideline

What's Changed: 2025 vs 2019

1. SCORE2 & SCORE2-OP Adoption

The 2025 update replaces the SCORE algorithm with SCORE2 and SCORE2-OP for cardiovascular risk estimation. This represents a major shift in how clinicians stratify patient risk.

2. Updated LDL-C Target Goals

Very High Risk (secondary prevention, HoFH):
<55 mg/dL (<1.4 mmol/L) with ≥50% reduction from baseline

High Risk (ASCVD, FH):
<70 mg/dL (<1.8 mmol/L)

Moderate Risk:
<100 mg/dL (<2.6 mmol/L)

Low Risk:
<116 mg/dL (<3.0 mmol/L)

3. New Evidence-Based Classes of Recommendations

Recommendations follow standardized classification:

4. Intensive Post-ACS LDL-Lowering

Strong new recommendation for early, intensive LDL-C lowering during acute coronary syndrome hospitalization:

Cardiovascular Risk Categories & LDL Targets

Risk Category SCORE2/OP 10-Yr Risk LDL-C Target LDL Reduction Goal Example Populations
Very High ≥20% (fatal + nonfatal) <55 mg/dL (<1.4 mmol/L) ≥50% from baseline Documented ASCVD, ACS, HoFH, DM with target organ damage
High 10-19% <70 mg/dL (<1.8 mmol/L) ≥50% if feasible HeFH, significant single RF, CKD, severe DM
Moderate 5-9% <100 mg/dL (<2.6 mmol/L) ≥30% if feasible Multiple risk factors, young age, moderate CKD
Low <5% <116 mg/dL (<3.0 mmol/L) Lifestyle + selective pharmacotherapy Young, no RF, low individual risk
Key Point: Intensity of LDL-C lowering should be determined by both absolute CVD risk AND the baseline untreated LDL-C level. Higher baseline LDL often requires more aggressive multi-drug therapy.

New & Updated Pharmacotherapy

Bempedoic Acid (BA)

Mechanism: ATP-citrate lyase inhibitor; reduces LDL-C synthesis upstream of statins
Monotherapy LDL reduction: ~23%
+ Statin combination: ~38% additional LDL reduction
Class I, Level B: Recommended for patients unable to take statin therapy or who require additional LDL-C lowering at LDL-C goal

Inclisiran (PCSK9 siRNA)

Mechanism: Small interfering RNA targeting PCSK9 mRNA
LDL reduction: ~50% at 50% efficacy; sustained effect
Class I, Level B: For patients with HoFH; Class IIb for ASCVD or statin-intolerant

Lp(a)-Lowering Agents

Pelacarsen (antisense oligonucleotide targeting apolipoprotein(a))

Obicetrapib

Updated Treatment Algorithm

Step-Wise LDL-C Lowering Approach

Step 1: Foundation Therapy

High-intensity statin (atorvastatin 40–80 mg or rosuvastatin 20–40 mg daily)
Expected LDL reduction: ~50% from baseline

Step 2: First Add-On (if LDL goal not reached)

Ezetimibe 10 mg daily
Additional LDL reduction: ~18–20% (cumulative ~60–70% with statin)

Step 3: Second Add-On (if still above target)

Option A: PCSK9 Monoclonal Antibody
Evolocumab 140 mg SC Q2W or alirocumab 75 mg SC Q2W
Additional LDL reduction: ~50%
(Cumulative: ~75–80%)
Option B: Inclisiran
284 mg SC at baseline, week 12, then Q6M
Additional LDL reduction: ~50%
(Cumulative: ~75–80%)

Step 4: Further Optimization (for very high-risk patients)

Add Bempedoic Acid 120 mg daily
Additional LDL reduction: ~20–25%
(Cumulative: ~80–85% with full triple therapy)

Special Circumstance: Post-ACS

Goal: Intensive LDL-C lowering to <55 mg/dL (<1.4 mmol/L) with ≥50% reduction from baseline

Timing: Initiate during index hospitalization

Approach:
  • Day 1–2: High-intensity statin + ezetimibe
  • Consider adding PCSK9i or inclisiran if LDL-C not approaching goal in acute phase
  • Check LDL-C at 4–6 weeks post-discharge; adjust therapy intensity based on absolute LDL achieved
  • Do not delay intensive therapy; early, lower LDL = lower recurrent event risk

Lipoprotein(a) Management

Epidemiology & Risk

New Recommendations

Class IIa Level B Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL (105 nmol/L) should be considered a cardiovascular risk modifier for individuals at moderate or higher risk for ASCVD.

Treatment Strategy

Principle: Lp(a) lowering works synergistically with aggressive LDL-C reduction. Do NOT substitute Lp(a) treatment for LDL-C management.

Hypertriglyceridemia Management

High-Dose Icosapent Ethyl (REDUCE-IT)

Class IIa Level B High-dose icosapent ethyl (2×2 g/day) should be considered in high-risk or very high-risk patients with elevated triglyceride levels (fasting 135–499 mg/dL; 1.52–5.63 mmol/L) on statin therapy.

Pemafibrate (PROMINENT) — Negative Result

Volasorsen (ApoC-III Inhibitor)

Statin Intolerance: Updated Definition & Management

Updated Definition

Statin intolerance is NOT simply the absence of any statin therapy. True statin intolerance requires:

  1. Documented class-confirmed muscle-related adverse reaction
  2. Clear temporal relationship: symptom onset during use, resolution after discontinuation
  3. Rechallenge with symptom recurrence (confirms causality)
  4. Inability to tolerate ANY statin at any dose

Rechallenge Protocol

Step 1: Education & Rechallenge

Counsel patient on trial-and-error approach. ~80% of patients can tolerate a statin with rechallenge.

Step 2: Restart at Lowest Dose

Pravastatin 10 mg daily OR Rosuvastatin 5 mg daily
Baseline assessment: Measure creatine kinase if symptoms severe

Step 3: Slow Titration

Increase dose every 2–4 weeks if tolerated. Many patients tolerate low doses successfully.

Step 4: Intermittent Dosing

If continuous dosing not tolerated, try every-other-day or once-weekly statin dosing. Efficacy is ~50–75% of daily dosing.

Step 5: Alternative Statin

Switch to a different statin (e.g., pravastatin if atorvastatin not tolerated). Cross-reactivity is rare.

Step 6: Non-Statin Alternatives

If NO statin tolerated: Ezetimibe + PCSK9i + inclisiran + bempedoic acid combination may achieve LDL-C reduction comparable to statin monotherapy.

Special Populations & Contexts

Elderly (≥70 Years)

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)

Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH)

Heterozygous FH (HeFH) — Prevalence ~1:250–500

Homozygous FH (HoFH) — Prevalence ~1:160,000–1,000,000

Post-Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)

People with HIV (PWH)

Key Recommendations Summary (Classes & Levels)

Cardiovascular Risk Estimation (New SCORE2/SCORE2-OP)

Recommendation Class Level
SCORE2 for <70-year-olds without ASCVD I B
SCORE2-OP for ≥70-year-olds I B
CAC score consideration as risk modifier IIa B

Pharmacological LDL-C Lowering

Agent / Situation Class Level Key Points
High-intensity statin (primary prevention at high/very high risk) I A Foundation therapy; proven CV benefit
Ezetimibe (high-risk patients not at goal on statin) I A ~18% additional LDL reduction; safe
PCSK9 inhibitors (HoFH) I A Proven benefit; standard of care
Inclisiran (HoFH) I B ~50% LDL reduction; alternative to PCSK9i
Bempedoic acid (high/very high risk not at goal) IIa B CLEAR Outcomes trial; additional ~20–25% LDL

Lipoprotein(a)

Recommendation Class Level
Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL (105 nmol/L) as CV risk modifier IIa B
Pelacarsen for Lp(a) lowering (when available) IIb B

Triglyceridemia

Agent Class Level Notes
High-dose icosapent ethyl (TG 135–499 mg/dL on statin) IIa B REDUCE-IT trial; modest CV benefit
Pemafibrate (T2DM hypertriglyceridemia) IIb B PROMINENT trial negative; limited use

Clinical Pearls: Do & Don't

✓ DO:

  • Use SCORE2/SCORE2-OP for cardiovascular risk estimation (replaces old SCORE)
  • Consider CAC score as risk modifier in intermediate-risk individuals
  • Initiate early, intensive LDL-lowering in post-ACS patients (during hospitalization)
  • Use combination therapy (statin + ezetimibe + PCSK9i/inclisiran) for very high-risk patients
  • Measure Lp(a) at least once in lifetime, especially in young FH or premature ASCVD
  • Monitor LDL-C 4–6 weeks after initiation/intensification of therapy
  • Consider rechallenge protocol for statin intolerance (intermittent dosing, alternative statins)
  • Use bempedoic acid for additional LDL reduction when LDL goal not achieved
  • Manage CVD risk in PWH aged ≥40 with statin therapy

✗ DON'T:

  • Use old SCORE algorithm thresholds; adopt SCORE2/SCORE2-OP instead
  • Delay statin therapy in high-risk primary prevention patients
  • Assume incomplete LDL-C reduction means intolerance (rechallenge often effective)
  • Treat elevated Lp(a) without concurrent aggressive LDL-C lowering
  • Prescribe fenofibrate or bezafibrate as monotherapy for triglyceride lowering
  • Ignore post-MI medication adherence; assess at 4–12 weeks post-discharge
  • Use unsupported supplements (omega-3, PUFAs) as sole treatment
  • Prescribe psyllium or plant sterols as primary dyslipidemia therapy
  • Delay intensive therapy in HoFH patients; early multi-drug approach optimal

Interactive Calculators & Risk Assessment Tools

The following risk assessment and treatment planning calculators are recommended and available:

Publication & Disclaimer

Citation: Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, et al. 2025 Focused Update of the 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias. European Heart Journal. 2025;46(45):4359–4378. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf190

Disclaimer: This document represents the views of the ESC/EAS and was produced after careful consideration of scientific and medical evidence. Health professionals should use clinical judgment and patient-specific factors when applying recommendations.

Permissions: Content published for personal and educational use. No commercial use without written permission from ESC and EAS. For permissions: journals.permissions@oup.com

Last Updated: March 2026 | Quick Reference by: Satti MD